14.9 C

Ratings agency S&P stops grading ESG credit risks



Credit ratings agency Standard & Poor’s has ditched numerically ranking corporate borrowers on their ESG risks amid a broader debate over ethical investing. 

Environmental, social and governance scores gained popularity in recent years by capturing risk factors such as costly CO2 emission legislation and pending class action lawsuits, which had previously mystified even professional money managers. 

The ratings division at S&P Global Inc had attempted to boil down each of the three ESG risks to a number on a scale of 1-5.

Yet just two years after introducing the ratings, the team announced the move had not been accepted by their customers.

Speaking to the Financial Times, the head of international fixed income at Natalliance Securities agreed with the decision. “I think it’s an overrated concept,” said Andy Brenner.

Confusion had swirled around the ratings system—many mistook the numeric grade as being tantamount to the kind of controversial ESG scores that saw Tesla get booted from an S&P sustainability index last year while oil giant Exxon Mobil was allowed to remain.

In reality, it was simply a way of measuring the impact of risks when judging whether a company would pay back its debt and no attempt to rank it as an ethical investment.

Another part of the parent company, namely S&P Global Sustainable1, is responsible for the kind of scoring that had Musk fuming “ESG is a scam” and “ESG is the devil”—even after Tesla was included once more in the sustainability index in June.

Lately corporate boards aiming to score highly as an ethical investment has become a flashpoint for debate in the finance community, with critics dubbing the practice as “woke capitalism”.  

ESG scores have been blamed for everything from Hollywood flops to the boycotts of Bud Light and Target. Some legislators have even attempted to pin the blame for Silicon Valley Bank’s collapse on ESG diversity policies rather than its failure to hedge its interest rate exposure.

S&P Global Ratings said it will continue to provide analysis of the credit risks stemming from ESG-related issues, they just won’t be given a simple grade. 

“After further review, we have determined that the dedicated analytical narrative paragraphs in our credit rating reports are most effective at providing detail and transparency on ESG credit factors material to our rating analysis,” the company said. 

Subscribe to Well Adjusted, our newsletter full of simple strategies to work smarter and live better, from the Fortune Well team. Sign up today.

Source link

Subscribe to our magazine

━ more like this

Valve suddenly says SteamVR 2.0 is now in beta — as headset rumors swirl

Greetings! Today we are shipping SteamVR 2.0 in beta. We see this is as the first major step toward our goal of bringing all of what’s...

Jeff Bezos’ Blue Origin spaceflight company gets a veteran Amazon executive as a new CEO amid setbacks and delays

Blue Origin, the closely held spaceflight company founded by Jeff Bezos, is replacing its chief executive officer with veteran Amazon.com executive Dave Limp.  Current...

What is Anthropic? The buzzy AI startup just got up to $4 billion in funding from Amazon as part of a colossal tech alliance

Amazon will invest up to $4 billion in Anthropic, one of the buzzy startups building a generative AI chatbot. With the deal, announced...

The DJI Mini 4 Pro is the first mini with binocular vision in every direction

Now that Skydio has exited the consumer drone business and will never sell me the miniature self-flying drone of my dreams, I’m looking...

Opinion | Political Lawfare May Get ‘Hobbesian’

The District of Columbia Attorney General threatens state sovereignty at the bidding of the left. Source link